Skip to content

Price vs. Value in OM & 000 Styled Acoustic Guitars

I own a Martin OM-28 and I love it. The guitar has 14 frets to the body which is the norm now days. It has a 25.4″ scale length and 1.75″ nut width with rosewood back and sides and ebony fingerboard. Of course it has a solid spruce top with X-bracing. It sound’s great whether you play with a pick, fingerpicks or bare fingers. But if I had to do it over I think I would choose something else. For one thing, it’s a lot of money. The guitar on the left currently sells (ballpark price) for $2900.

There are better values in acoustic guitars today than at anytime in my life.

Once upon a time low priced guitars were junk, nearly toys. It wasn’t just that many had poorly bolted on necks and laminated (plywood) tops but even the better of the lot were poorly setup with inaccurate neck angles, poorly polished and finished frets, high nuts and high saddles. This has changed. There are now many acoustic guitars available for under $1000, even under $500 which have solid tops and, accurate angles and excellent construction details.

An example of a nice replica of the OM style at about half the price is available from Larrivee (image to right).This is the Larrivee OM-40 Legacy in Rosewood and is about $1425 1. But you can still do better. I’ll show you a few more examples.

The next one is from one of my favorite guitar companies, Eastman. I own one of their jazz guitars (AR371ce). I tried some of their acoustics in guitar shops. The Eastman E20 Orchestra Model is shown on the left. “OM” stands for Orchestra Model. The image is for the sunburst finish but it’s also available in a natural finish. The price isn’t that different from the Larrivee OM. The Eastman OM is about $1200.

Ibanez has added the OM shaped guitar to their line of acoustics (right image). It is a limited edition model (Original OM Model, AVM1NT Limited Edition Artwood). The price is about half of the Eastman making it a very good value. However, according the Ibanez website the nut width is 43 mm putting closer to standard guitars and not the OM specs of 1 3/4″. That’s a minor disappointment for me but you might not care.

So far all of the OM guitars I’ve shown you are replicas of the traditional OM-28 or OM-21 style with rosewood back and sides, ebony fingerboard and solid spruce top. A mahogany version of the guitar is the OM-18. Among current models is a re-issue of the Martin OM-18 Authentic 1933 Acoustic Guitar. It is about $5000. An OM-15 has all mahogany woods. Mahogany is less expensive that rosewood and gives the guitar a different sound. Not worse, just different. The other thing to know is that the martin 000 body shape is the same as an OM. On 14 frets to the body guitars the difference between OM and 000 is nut width and scale length. There is no such thing as a 12 fret to the body OM. Originally, when 000 were made with 12 frets to the body they had a wider nut width.

All of this is leading up to the fact you can save even more money (better value) by choosing a mahogany body guitar in the 000 or OM style from makers other than Martin. The guitar on the left is the Recording King ROH-05 Dirty Thirties Solid Top OOO and sells for about $200. It has a solid spruce top and X-bracing but the back and sides are described as “white wood”. The guitar on the right is the Recording King ROS-06 Classic Series 12th Fret 000 Acoustic has mahogany back and sides and a slotted head for a traditional 000 appearance. It is about $250.

There are so many choices of fine acoustic guitars available to players today the questions is whether spending more that $2000 on one is the best use of your money. But feel free to ignore me. I already have a Martin.



  1. Prices vary with time and place. These price were current on Amazon Jan. 2015.

2 thoughts on “Price vs. Value in OM & 000 Styled Acoustic Guitars”

  1. Hi,I have three martins all different in voice which is important to me,as is the breedlove
    000r revival which is a 12 fret 000 closely resembling the golden era martins.
    I also have at least two other makes with laminated back and sides which makes a big
    difference to both tone and volume plus the weight.I do wish that more manufacturers
    would follow the lead of recording king and use a cheap solid wood for the back and sides of guitars as this should produce better tone transmission and significantly reduce
    weight and price whilst increasing volume.I would much rather have a birch back and sides than a laminated maple for example.

    Alvarez yari is one company that are using all solid woods for their mid priced guitars.

    Great website!!



    Martin HJ28,Martin 000cNylon,Martin CEO7,Breedlove 000R Revival,
    Avares Yari MP70E,Breedlove OM ERE,Washburn R321 SWRK,Sigma LM-SG00.

    If i could only keep one,it would have to be the 000r Revival……………

  2. It’s true, there are many choices available today for the person looking for a well-made guitar with great tone. And as far as I can tell, there’s a reason for that – Asia. Eastman, Guild, Blueridge and others are making great guitars in Asia, mostly it seems, in China.

    Some things are well made in the US, and guitars are among them. So if you get a Martin, a Collings, a Taylor guitar (above a certain price point), you’re supporting jobs in the US. I personally think that’s a good thing.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.